![]() TESOL Quarterly, 9, 401-407.ĭjajadiningrat, I. The Learner's interlanguage as a system of variable rules. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 147-160.ĭickerson, L. Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Ĭorder, S.P. Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Interlanguage is not a state of mind: An evaluation of the construct for second-language acquisition. International Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 1(10), 1-10.īialystok, E., and Sharwood Smith, M. Debunking the notion of nativization in the pronunciation variation at segmental level among non-native ESL teachers in Sabah, Malaysia. These phonological variations emerge due to the generalization of pronunciation by similar-ending sounds, the certain vowel sound preceding marked sounds, and the absence of consonant clusters in learners’ native language which bears the variation of certain marked fricatives of English.Īzizi, A. ![]() The result showed that fricatives such as, , and have phonological variations in interlanguage with certain positions of word being pronounced. The analysis was done quantitatively to find the percentages of non-interlanguge sounds and interlanguge ones produced by respondents. There were 600-word tokens containing target marked sounds of fricative, ,, and obtained from the data collection. ![]() The data were taken from two types of task namely word list reading and sentence reading. There were 30 college students of English study purposively selected to become respondents in this research representing advance and intermediate proficiency of English speaking. This study is aimed at finding out (1) marked sounds of English fricatives:, ,, and which are indicated as interlanguage variants and (2) how interlanguage sound variants emerge based on surround the varying element. ![]() Variability in phonology of interlanguage is the most interesting subject to investigate based on markedness differential hypothesis theory. In the interlanguage phase, Indonesian learners of English tend to alternate between two forms of language features to express the same language function where a variation of language forms will be exhibited to mark the variable of linguistic function. Interlanguage is the most fruitful issue in the field of second language acquisition. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |